第 3期高 敏: ?!三国志裴松之注引书考 序号书? ?? 名作者 始见 卷数 成书 年代 赵氏 录否 钱氏 录否 沈氏 录否 王氏 录否 隋志 录否 备? 注 253答问胡? 冲卷 59东吴录 254礼论卷 59录录录 255丧服图谢? 慈卷 59东吴 256变除卷 59东吴 257交广记王? 隐卷 60晋录录录录 258诸葛恪别传卷 64魏晋间录录录录 表 2? !三国志裴注所引书目存疑表 序号书? ?? 名作者 始见 卷数 成书 年代 赵氏 录否 钱氏 录否 沈氏 录否 王氏 录否 隋志 录否 备? 注 1杂记孙? 盛卷 1晋录录 2异同评孙? 盛卷 1晋录录录 3晋书孙? 盛卷 4晋 4晋书干? 宝卷 4晋 5杂语孙? 盛卷 9晋录录!隋志不著撰者名 6冀州记荀? 绰卷 9录录 7百官名志卷 15录 8兖州记荀? 绰卷 16录 9文士传张? 骘卷 21晋录 10管辂传阎? 缵卷 29晋 11异同记孙? 盛卷 35晋 12益州耆旧传卷 38魏晋间 13中经部荀? 勖卷 38晋录!隋志称!晋中经 14 益 部耆 旧传 杂 记 卷 41魏晋间 15耆旧卷 45魏晋间 16献帝春秋袁? 晔卷 57晋录录 BooksUsed by Pei Songzhi on Noting # History of theThreeKingdoms GAO M in (Depart ment ofH istory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 , China) Abstract : The historical materials that Pei Songzhi noted # H istory of the Three Kingdom s used was more valuable than #H istory of the Three Kingdom s itsel. f The reason for this is that the books of # Pei Songzhi+ s Notes on H istory of the Three Kingdom s+ were plentifu. lThere were many people who studied # Pei Songzhi+ sNotes on H istory of the Three Kingdoms+ .Zhao J, i Q ian Daxin ,Shen Jiaben andW ang Zuyi were themain researchers ,but many of their opinions were differen. t On the basis of studying the difference and its reason the paper put forward that Pei Songzhi quoted 258 books,therewere 36 books that Zhao, Q ian , Shen andWang didn+ t record ,there were 15 books that they recorded differently,and there were 16 books which had questions to be recorded .The books # Pei Songzhi+ sNotes on H istory of the Three Kingdoms+ and the bookswhich had questionswere listed at the end . Key words : # H istory of the Three Kingdoms; # Pei Songzhi+ sNotes on H istory of the Three Kingdoms+ ; books of # Pei Songzhi+ sNotes on H istory of the Three Kingdoms+ %21%